Topical question: how can we take from this box out to the
other one by adding a couple of thing
Your agenda:
1.
A path with steps for building the curriculum
2.
Examples of schools that have done this well
3.
What typical pitfalls/mistakes
4.
How much can you repurpose and ruse?
5.
What should get priority? E.g. content?
6.
P.4.
7.
How to coordinate across the curricula?
8.
E.g. requirement by graduate school
Credited program: education, sports…you
need to do these kind of things, but they don’t really tell you how to do it: The
things we are doing for after graduation/overarchieching (leadership means
different things, you guys mentioned a lot on the webpage) if you claim you
want to do
What you really what us to prepare them to take
We will then start from here.
You are preparing them future, not only present
We are prepare for the students in the business will be out
in 10 years
Simple problems:
Complex problems:
like climate change, we even don’t know the perimeters
Where, how good
Map software
We project on the screen and then move around
What will happen if we do this ? before you invest on this
Let’s put the curriculum up; because they start it at the
wrong place
1.
Degree/program LOs (1a)
2.
Course LOs (1a)
3.
Standards (how do you set that it’s A, and when
do you)
4.
Summative Assessment (3)
5.
Diagnostic/Formative (don’t grade, but give
feedback) (4)
6.
Learning Activities (2)
7.
Content
(1)
8.
Teaching strategies (2a)
9.
Evaluation (9)
Post study abroad?
Ground roles
Our required course
No gen ed
Bus test: in the mid of the course, should not require high
specialized, highly document; well designed
No comments:
Post a Comment