Thursday, June 1, 2017


Topical question: how can we take from this box out to the other one by adding a couple of thing

Your agenda:
1.     A path with steps for building the curriculum
2.     Examples of schools that have done this well
3.     What typical pitfalls/mistakes
4.     How much can you repurpose and ruse?
5.     What should get priority? E.g. content?
6.     P.4.
7.     How to coordinate across the curricula?
8.     E.g. requirement by graduate school

Credited program: education, sports…you need to do these kind of things, but they don’t really tell you how to do it: The things we are doing for after graduation/overarchieching (leadership means different things, you guys mentioned a lot on the webpage) if you claim you want to do


What you really what us to prepare them to take
We will then start from here.
You are preparing them future, not only present
We are prepare for the students in the business will be out in 10 years
Simple problems:
Complex problems:  like climate change, we even don’t know the perimeters

Where, how good
Map software
We project on the screen and then move around
What will happen if we do this ? before you invest on this
Let’s put the curriculum up; because they start it at the wrong place

1.     Degree/program LOs (1a)
2.     Course LOs (1a)
3.     Standards (how do you set that it’s A, and when do you)
4.     Summative Assessment (3)
5.     Diagnostic/Formative (don’t grade, but give feedback) (4)
6.     Learning Activities (2)
7.     Content  (1)
8.     Teaching strategies (2a)
9.     Evaluation (9)

Post study abroad?
Ground roles
Our required course
No gen ed
Bus test: in the mid of the course, should not require high specialized, highly document; well designed

No comments:

Post a Comment